|
Attitudes of 146 health visitors from the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale |
||||||
| SD-strongly disagree, D-disagree, N-neutral, A-agree, SA-strongly agree |
SD % |
D % |
N % |
A % |
SA % |
|
|
|
||||||
| 1. |
The benefits of breast milk last only as long as the baby is breast fed* |
76 |
11 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
| 2. |
Formula feeding is more convenient than breastfeeding* |
56 |
24 |
12 |
3 |
5 |
| 3. |
Breastfeeding increases mother infant bonding |
3 |
6 |
16 |
20 |
55 |
| 4. |
Breast milk is lacking in iron* |
40 |
26 |
18 |
6 |
9 |
| 5. |
Formula fed babies are more likely to be overfed than breastfed babies |
3 |
11 |
20 |
37 |
30 |
| 6. |
Formula feeding is the better choice if the mother plans to go back to work* |
39 |
39 |
19 |
3 |
1 |
| 7. |
Mothers who formula feed miss one of the great joys of motherhood |
12 |
12 |
28 |
24 |
24 |
| 8. |
Women should not breastfeed in public places such as restaurants* |
82 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
| 9. |
Breastfed babies are healthier than formula fed babies |
3 |
5 |
16 |
32 |
45 |
| 10. |
Breastfed babies are more likely to be overfed than formula fed babies* |
60 |
21 |
14 |
2 |
3 |
| 11. |
Fathers feel left out if a mother breast feeds* |
16 |
23 |
42 |
18 |
1 |
| 12. |
Breast milk is the ideal food for babies |
7 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
91 |
| 13. |
Breast milk is more easily digested than formula |
6 |
2 |
0 |
8 |
84 |
| 14. |
Formula is as healthy for an infant as breast milk* |
44 |
29 |
19 |
6 |
2 |
| 15. |
Breastfeeding is more convenient than formula |
3 |
2 |
12 |
29 |
54 |
| 16. |
Breast milk is cheaper than formula |
5 |
3 |
5 |
10 |
77 |
| 17. |
A mother who occasionally drinks alcohol should not breastfeed her baby* |
47 |
31 |
15 |
3 |
4 |
|
*Variables reverse scored to calculate total infant feeding attitude so that a strongly breastfeeding attitude has a score of 5 for each question giving a maximum score of 85 and minimum of 17 Mean score 71.2 SD 8.4 Cronbach's a = 0.79, median 72, range 28–85, interquartile range 66–77 | ||||||
Tappin et al. International Breastfeeding Journal 2006 1:11 doi:10.1186/1746-4358-1-11 |
||||||