<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>International Breastfeeding Journal - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by International Breastfeeding Journal</description>
        <dc:date>2012-01-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/11" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/1">
        <title>Infant feeding practices in Bhaktapur, Nepal: A cross-sectional, health facility based survey</title>
        <description>Background:
Promotion of proper breastfeeding practices for the first six months of life is the most cost-effective intervention for reducing childhood morbidity and mortality. However, the adherence to breastfeeding recommendations in many developing countries is not satisfactory. The aims of the study were to determine breastfeeding and infant feeding patterns at nine months of age and to assess factors influencing exclusive breastfeeding practices.
Methods:
In Bhaktapur, Nepal, we carried out a cross-sectional survey of 325 infants who came for measles vaccination at the age of nine months. Mothers were interviewed on details regarding feeding of their child and health since birth.
Results:
Three quarters of all mothers reported that they did not receive any information on breastfeeding during the antenatal visit. Two hundred and ninety five (91%) mothers gave colostrum and 185 (57%) initiated breastfeeding within one hour of delivery. The prevalence of exclusively breastfeeding at 1, 3 and 6 months were 240 (74%), 78 (24%) and 29 (9%), and partial feeding was initiated in 49 (15%), 124 (38%) and 257 (79%) babies, respectively. The main reason, according to the mother, for introducing other foods before six months of age was insufficient breast milk. In logistic regression analyses, mother&apos;s knowledge on how long child should be given only breast milk and not living in joint families were associated positively with exclusive or predominant breastfeeding for four months or beyond.
Conclusions:
Despite the high proportion of mothers who initiated breastfeeding immediately after birth, continuation of exclusive breastfeeding for up to six months was not common. Very few mothers received any information on breastfeeding during the antenatal visit, indicating a need for counseling on exclusive breastfeeding. Possible options for this counseling could be during antenatal visits and at regular clinic visits for vaccination.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Manjeswori Ulak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ram Chandyo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lotta Mellander</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Prakash Shrestha</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tor Strand</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2012, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-7-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-7-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/19">
        <title>Female employees&apos; perceptions of organisational support for breastfeeding at work: findings from an Australian health service workplace</title>
        <description>Background:
Women&apos;s return to work can be a significant barrier to continued breastfeeding. Workplace policies and practices to promote and support continued, and longer duration of, breastfeeding are important. In the context of the introduction of a new breastfeeding policy for Area Health Services in New South Wales, Australia, a baseline survey was conducted to describe current practices and examine women&apos;s reports of perceived organisational support on breastfeeding intention and practice.
Methods:
A cross sectional survey of female employees of the Sydney South West Area Health Service was conducted in late 2009. A mailed questionnaire was sent to 998 eligible participants who had taken maternity leave over the 20-month period from January 2008 to August 2009. The questionnaire collected items assessing breastfeeding intentions, awareness of workplace policies, and the level of organisational and social support available. For those women who had returned to work, further questions were asked to assess the perceptions and practices of breastfeeding in the work environment, as well as barriers and enabling factors to combining breastfeeding and work.
Results:
Returning to work was one of the main reasons women ceased breastfeeding, with 60 percent of women intending to breastfeed when they returned to work, but only 40 percent doing so. Support to combine breastfeeding and work came mainly from family and partners (74% and 83% respectively), with little perceived support from the organisation (13%) and human resources (6%). Most women (92%) had received no information from their managers about their breastfeeding options upon their return to work, and few had access to a room specially designated for breastfeeding (19%). Flexible work options and lactation breaks, as well as access to a private room, were identified as the main factors that facilitate breastfeeding at work.
Conclusions:
Enabling women to continue breastfeeding at work has benefits for the infant, employee and organisation. However, this baseline study of health employees revealed that women felt largely unsupported by managers and their organisation to continue breastfeeding at work.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Danielle Weber</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anneka Janson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michelle Nolan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Li Ming Wen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chris Rissel</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2011, null:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-6-19</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-6-19-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/18">
        <title>Feeding practices among children attending child welfare clinics in Ragama MOH area: a descriptive cross-sectional study </title>
        <description>Background:
Feeding during early childhood is important for normal physical and mental growth as well as for health in later life. Currently, Sri Lanka has adopted the WHO recommendation of exclusive breastfeeding for six months, followed by addition of complementary feeds thereafter, with continuation of breastfeeding up to or beyond two years. This study was conducted to evaluate the current feeding practices among Sri Lankan children during early childhood.
Methods:
This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in the Ragama Medical Officer of Health (MOH) area. It was conducted between 10 August 2010 and 30 October 2010. Children between the ages of 24 and 60 months, attending child welfare clinics, were included in the study on consecutive basis. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data regarding sociodemographic characteristics and feeding practices.
Results:
There were 208 boys and 202 girls in the study population. Of them, 255 (62.2%) were exclusively breastfed up to 6 months. Younger children had a statistically significant, higher rate of exclusive breastfeeding compared to older children. Three hundred and fifty one (85.6%) children had received infant formula, and it was started before the age of 6 months in 61 children, and in 212 before one year. Sugar was added to infant formula in 330 (80.4%) children, and out of them 144 had sugar added within first year of life. Complementary foods were started before 4 months in 29 (7%) children. Of the 410 children, 294 (71.7%) were breastfed beyond 2 years and 41.6% of them were breastfed at regular intervals throughout the day. Three hundred and thirty eight (82.6%) children were receiving overnight feeding of either breast milk or infant formula even after 2 years.
Conclusions:
Though a high rate of exclusive breastfeeding was observed in this study population, there are many other issues related to feeding during the early years of life that need immediate intervention. Too early introduction of complementary food, using infant formula without an indication, adding sugar to infant formula, too frequent breastfeeding and overnight feeding of older children are among them.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Priyantha Perera</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Meranthi Fernando</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Taniya Warnakulasuria</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nayomi Ranathunga</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2011, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-6-18</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-6-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/17">
        <title>Prevalence and predictors of exclusive breastfeeding among women in Kigoma Region, Western Tanzania: a community based cross-sectional study</title>
        <description>Background:
Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) for the first six months of infants&apos; lives is a cost effective intervention in saving children&apos;s lives and can avert 13 - 15% of the 9 million deaths of children under 5 years old in resource poor settings. However, EBF rates have been shown to be low in resource poor settings, ranging between 20 and 40%. In Tanzania, the prevalence of EBF among infants under 6 months is 41%, with limited information on predictors of EBF. The aim of the study was to determine prevalence of EBF and its predictors in Kigoma Municipality, Western Tanzania.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted in March to May 2010 among 402 consenting women, with infants aged 6 to 12 months, from randomly selected households. A questionnaire was used to collect information on demographic characteristics, knowledge of EBF, infant feeding practices, and on HIV status.
Results:
The prevalence of EBF among women in Kigoma Municipality was 58%. Knowledge of EBF was relatively higher (86%) compared to the practice. In the multivariable analysis, women with adequate knowledge of EBF (AOR 5.4), women who delivered at health facilities (AOR 3.0) and women who had no problems related to breasts, like engorgement/cracked nipples (AOR 6.6) were more likely to exclusively breastfeed compared to others.
Conclusions:
Prevalence of EBF in Kigoma municipality was slightly higher than the national figure of 41%, however it was way below the EBF prevalence of 90% recommended by the WHO. Strategies that target improving knowledge and skills for lactation management among women, as well as strategies to improve health facility delivery, may help to improve EBF in this setting.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Tiras Nkala</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sia Msuya</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2011, null:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-6-17</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-6-17-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/16">
        <title>Emergency preparedness for those who care for infants in developed country contexts</title>
        <description>Emergency management organisations recognise the vulnerability of infants in emergencies, even in developed countries. However, thus far, those who care for infants have not been provided with detailed information on what emergency preparedness entails. Emergency management authorities should provide those who care for infants with accurate and detailed information on the supplies necessary to care for them in an emergency, distinguishing between the needs of breastfed infants and the needs of formula fed infants. Those who care for formula fed infants should be provided with detailed information on the supplies necessary for an emergency preparedness kit and with information on how to prepare formula feeds in an emergency. An emergency preparedness kit for exclusively breastfed infants should include 100 nappies and 200 nappy wipes. The contents of an emergency preparedness for formula fed infants will vary depending upon whether ready-to-use liquid infant formula or powdered infant formula is used. If ready-to-use liquid infant formula is used, an emergency kit should include: 56 serves of ready-to-use liquid infant formula, 84 L water, storage container, metal knife, small bowl, 56 feeding bottles and teats/cups, 56 zip-lock plastic bags, 220 paper towels, detergent, 120 antiseptic wipes, 100 nappies and 200 nappy wipes. If powdered infant formula is used, an emergency preparedness kit should include: two 900 g tins powdered infant formula, 170 L drinking water, storage container, large cooking pot with lid, kettle, gas stove, box of matches/lighter, 14 kg liquid petroleum gas, measuring container, metal knife, metal tongs, feeding cup, 300 large sheets paper towel, detergent, 100 nappies and 200 nappy wipes. Great care with regards hygiene should be taken in the preparation of formula feeds. Child protection organisations should ensure that foster carers responsible for infants have the resources necessary to formula feed in the event of an emergency. Exclusive and continued breastfeeding should be promoted as an emergency preparedness activity by emergency management organisations as well as health authorities. The greater the proportion of infants exclusively breastfed when an emergency occurs, the more resilient the community, and the easier it will be to provide effective aid to the caregivers of formula fed infants.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Karleen Gribble</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nina Berry</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2011, null:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-11-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-6-16</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-6-16-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/15">
        <title>Trends in breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices in Pakistan, 1990-2007</title>
        <description>Background:
Breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices have profound implications for the maternal and child health status of a society. Feeding practices in Pakistan are suboptimal, leading to adverse outcomes on child health. In Pakistan, the Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health (MNCH) Program, in collaboration with several international organizations, including WHO and UNICEF, is working to improve these feeding practices in the country. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of these programs.
Methods:
Estimates on the various indicators for infant and young child feeding proposed by WHO were analyzed in light of the Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys (1990-91 and 2006-07) and several other national studies conducted since 1995.
Results:
Nearly half the core and optional indicators have improved over the years, though modestly; the others have demonstrated no statistically significant improvement over the years. Of the five indicators required in the WHO tool for the assessment of infant and young child feeding, introduction of complementary foods, bottle-feeding, and early initiation of breastfeeding, stand in the poor category, while exclusive breastfeeding and duration of breastfeeding fall in the fair category, suggesting an overall poor status.
Conclusions:
There is considerable scope to improve breastfeeding and complementary feeding in Pakistan. Further programs should focus on improving the following indicators that have shown no significant development: early initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding under six months, continued breastfeeding at two years, age appropriate feeding, and bottle feeding. Effective implementation of interventions that are known to improve breastfeeding practices is imperative, as is further research to yield data that can lead future endeavors.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Hafsa Muhammad Hanif</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2011, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-10-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-6-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-6-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-10-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/14">
        <title>Infant feeding experiences among teen mothers in North Carolina: Findings from a mixed-methods study</title>
        <description>Background:
Adolescent mothers in the U.S. are much less likely to initiate breastfeeding than older mothers, and teens who do initiate breastfeeding tend to breastfeed for shorter durations. The purpose of this mixed-methods study is to investigate breastfeeding practices, barriers and facilitators among adolescent mothers ages 17 and younger.
Methods:
Quantitative descriptive analyses are conducted using data from the North Carolina Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). The population-based sample comprises 389 teens ages 13-17 giving birth to a live born infant in North Carolina in 2000 - 2005 and in 2007. Qualitative analyses are based on in-depth interviews with 22 Black, White and Hispanic teen mothers residing in rural and urban areas of North Carolina conducted between November 2007 and February 2009.
Results:
In quantitative analyses, 52% (196 of 389) of North Carolina teen mothers initiated breastfeeding, but half of those who initiated breastfeeding (92/196) stopped within the first month postpartum. Hispanic teens (44/52 or 89%) were much more likely than Black (61/159 or 41%) or White teens (87/164 or 52%) to initiate breastfeeding and to continue for a longer duration. Nearly sixty two percent (29/52) of Hispanic respondents breastfed for greater than four weeks as compared to 16% (29/159) of Black respondents and 26% (39/164) of White respondents. Common barriers to breastfeeding initiation and continuation included not liking breastfeeding, returning to school, nipple pain, and insufficient milk. Qualitative data provided context for the quantitative findings, elucidating the barriers and facilitators to breastfeeding from the teens&apos; perspective and insight into the ways in which breastfeeding support to teens could be enhanced.
Conclusions:
The large number of adolescents ceasing breastfeeding within the first month points to the need for more individualized follow-up after hospital discharge in the first few days postpartum, to address common technical challenges and to provide assistance managing the transition back to school. Provision of an extra home visit or outpatient visit for teens within the first few days following hospital discharge, and advocacy to make schools more compatible with breastfeeding, could potentially help teens who desire to breastfeed to successfully continue. These interventions warrant further research to test their effectiveness among adolescents.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Christine Tucker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ellen Wilson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ghazaleh Samandari</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2011, null:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-09-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-6-14</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-6-14-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-09-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/13">
        <title>Effect of using HIV and infant feeding counselling cards on the quality of counselling provided to HIV positive mothers: a cluster randomized controlled trial</title>
        <description>Background:
Counselling human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive mothers on safer infant and young child feeding (IYCF) options is an important component of programmes to prevent mother to child transmission of HIV, but the quality of counselling is often inadequate. The aim of this study was to determine the effect the World Health Organization HIV and infant feeding cards on the quality of counselling provided to HIV positive mothers by health workers about safer infant feeding options.MethodThis was a un-blinded cluster-randomized controlled field trial in which 36 primary health facilities in Kafue and Lusaka districts in Zambia were randomized to intervention (IYCF counselling with counselling cards) or non- intervention arm (IYCF counselling without counselling cards). Counselling sessions with 10 HIV positive women attending each facility were observed and exit interviews were conducted by research assistants.
Results:
Totals of 180 women in the intervention group and 180 women in the control group were attended to by health care providers and interviewed upon exiting the health facility. The health care providers in the intervention facilities more often discussed the advantages of disclosing their HIV status to a household member (RR = 1.46, 95% CI [1.11, 1.92]); used visual aids in explaining the risk of HIV transmission through breast milk (RR = 4.65, 95% CI [2.28, 9.46]); and discussed the advantages and disadvantages of infant feeding options for HIV positive mothers (all p values &lt; 0.05). The differences also included exploration of the home situation (p &lt; 0.05); involving the partner in the process of choosing a feeding option (RR = 1.38, 95% CI [1.09, 1.75]); and exploring how the mother will manage to feed the baby when she is at work (RR = 2.82, 95% CI [1.70, 4.67]). The clients in the intervention group felt that the provider was more caring and understanding (RR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.19, 2.75]).
Conclusion:
The addition of counselling cards to the IYCF counselling session for HIV positive mothers were a valuable aid to counselling and significantly improved the quality of the counselling session.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Mary Katepa-Bwalya</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chipepo Kankasa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Olusegun Babaniyi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Seter Siziya</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2011, null:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-09-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-6-13</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-6-13-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-09-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/12">
        <title>Impact of education and training on type of care provided by community-based breastfeeding counselors: a cross-sectional study</title>
        <description>Background:
Studies using community-based breastfeeding counselors (CBBCs) have repeatedly shown positive impact on breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity and duration, particularly among low-income mothers. To date, there has not been a comprehensive study to determine the impact of CBBC attributes such as educational background and training, on the type of care that CBBCs provide.
Methods:
This was a cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of CBBCs to ascertain the influence of counselor education and type of training on type of support and proficiency of CBBCs in communities across the United States. Invitations to participate in this online survey of CBBCs were e-mailed to program coordinators of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), La Leche League, and other community-based health organizations, who in turn invited and encouraged their CBBCs to participate. Descriptive analysis was used to describe participants (N = 847), while bivariate analysis using &#967;2 test was used to examine the differences between CBBC education, training received and breastfeeding support skills used. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the independent determinants of specific breastfeeding support skills.
Results:
The major findings from the research indicate that overall, educational attainment of CBBCs is not a significant predictor for the curriculum used in their training and type of support skills used during counseling sessions, but initial training duration was positively associated with the use of many breastfeeding support skills. Another major influence of counselor support to clients is the type of continuing education they receive after their initial training, with higher likelihood of use of desirable support skills associated with counselors continuing their breastfeeding education at conferences or trainings away from their job sites.
Conclusions:
Our results show that different programs use different training curricula to train their CBBCs varying in duration and content. Counselor education is not a significant predictor of the type of training they receive. Continuing breastfeeding education is a significant determinant of type of counseling techniques used with clients. Further research is therefore needed to critically examine the content of the various training curricula of CBBC programs. This may show a need for a standardized training curriculum for all CBBC programs worldwide to make CBBCs more proficient and efficient, ensuring successful and optimum breastfeeding experiences for mothers and their newborns.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Elizabeth Sullivan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Whitney Bignell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne Andrianos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alex Anderson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2011, null:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-08-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-6-12</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-6-12-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-08-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/11">
        <title>Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health professionals and women towards medication use in breastfeeding: A review</title>
        <description>Many breastfeeding women require and regularly take medicines, especially those available over-the-counter, and the safe use of these is dependent on the advice provided by health professionals such as general practitioners and pharmacists. The primary aim of this review therefore, was to investigate the literature relating to health professionals&apos; and women&apos;s knowledge, attitudes and practices towards medication use and safety in breastfeeding. The limited literature that was uncovered identified that general practitioners and pharmacists have poor knowledge, but positive attitudes, and variable practices that are mostly guided by personal experience. They tend to make decisions about the use of a medicine whilst breastfeeding based on the potential &apos;risk&apos; that it poses to the infant in terms of possible adverse reactions, rather than its &apos;compatibility&apos; with breast milk. The decision-making process between health professionals and women is usually not a negotiated process, and women are often asked to stop breastfeeding whilst taking a medicine. Women, in turn, are left dissatisfied with the advice received, many choosing not to initiate therapy or not to continue breastfeeding. Some directions for future research have been suggested to address the issues identified in this critical area. This review is important from a societal perspective because many breastfeeding women require and regularly take medications, especially those available without prescription, and the safe use of these is dependent on the advice provided by health professionals, which is ultimately influenced by their knowledge, attitudes and practices. However, there is an absence of high quality evidence from randomised controlled trials on the safety of medications taken during breastfeeding, which naturally would hinder health professionals from appropriately advising women. It is equally important to know about women&apos;s experiences of advice received from health professionals, and whether there is consistency between recommendations made across resources on medication safety in breastfeeding, in order to gain a full understanding of the issues prevalent in this area of practice.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Safeera Hussainy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Narmin Dermele</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2011, null:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-08-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-6-11</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-6-11-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-08-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

