<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>International Breastfeeding Journal - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.commostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from International Breastfeeding Journal (ISSN 1746-4358) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/18"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/17"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/13"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/13"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/16"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/19"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/1/1/24"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/15"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/20"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/18">
            
            <title>Effect of infant feeding on maternal body composition

</title>
			<description>Background:
Women gain total body weight and accrue body fat during pregnancy. Breastfeeding has been suggested as an efficient means of promoting postpartum weight loss due to its high energy cost. We investigated the effect of infant feeding mode on maternal body composition.
Methods:
This study evaluated maternal weight and percent body fat changes in exclusively breastfeeding versus mixed feeding mothers during the first 12 weeks postpartum using the BOD POD. Twenty four mothers aged 19 - 42 years were studied. Participants were recruited from Athens-Clarke County and surrounding areas of the State of Georgia, USA. The study was conducted between November 2005 and December 2006.
Results:
Prepregnancy weight was higher in mixed feeding mothers than in exclusively breastfeeding mothers (68.4 kg vs. 61.4 kg) but the difference was not statistically significant. At 12 weeks postpartum, exclusively breastfeeding mothers had lost more total body weight than mixed feeding mothers (4.41 +/- 4.10 kg versus 2.79 +/- 3.09 kg; p = 0.072). There was no significant difference in fat weight change between the two groups (4.38 +/- 2.06 kg versus 4.17 +/- 2.63 kg). However, mixed feeding mothers lost slightly more percent body fat than exclusively breastfeeding mothers (1.90 +/- 4.18 kg versus 1.71 +/- 3.48 kg), but the difference was not statistically significant. The trend in percent body fat loss was significant among exclusively breastfeeding mothers (p = 0.034) but not mixed feeding mothers (p = 0.081). Exclusively breastfeeding mothers consumed more calories than mixed feeding mothers (1980 +/- 618 kcal versus 1541 +/- 196 kcal p = 0.08). Physical activity levels were, however, higher in mixed feeding mothers than exclusively breastfeeding mothers.
Conclusions:
Our results provide further evidence that exclusive breastfeeding promotes greater weight loss than mixed feeding among mothers even in the early postpartum period. This suggests that there is the need to encourage mothers to exclusively breastfeed as a means of overweight and obesity prevention.</description>
			<link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/18</link>		
			<dc:creator>Irene E Hatsu, Dawn M McDougald and Alex K Anderson</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2008, 3:18</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 780</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-06</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-3-18</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-06</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/17">
            
            <title>The breastfeeding experience of women with major difficulties who use the services of a breastfeeding clinic: a descriptive study</title>
			<description>Background:
Many women experience breastfeeding difficulties. Sometimes these difficulties lead to breastfeeding cessation. Breastfeeding clinics provide support for women facing such problems. This study aims to describe the breastfeeding experience of women, particularly those who use the services of the breastfeeding clinic located in the Greater Quebec City area.
Methods:
This is a descriptive study based on information gathered through telephone questionnaires that were administered in 2006 to a sample of 86 women and semi-structured interviews conducted with 12 of these women.
Results:
Painful nipples/breasts, low milk supply and latching difficulties were the three most frequent major breastfeeding problems identified by women. Their personal characteristics as well as the moral and physical support provided by family and friends and by health professional and clinicians at the breastfeeding clinic were the factors identified most often as having a positive influence on the breastfeeding experience.
Conclusion:
The results suggest that breastfeeding clinics have a critical role to play in improving the breastfeeding experience of women with major difficulties.</description>
			<link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/17</link>		
			<dc:creator>Caroline Lamontagne, Anne-Marie Hamelin and Monik St-Pierre</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2008, 3:17</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 770</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-05</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-3-17</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-05</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/11">
            
            <title>Overabundant milk supply: an alternative way to intervene by full drainage and block feeding</title>
			<description>Background:
Too much or too little milk production are common problems in a lactation consultant's practice. Whereas underproduction is widely discussed in the lactation literature, overabundant milk supply is not. In my practice I work with women who experience moderate to severe oversupply syndrome. In most cases the syndrome can be successfully treated with full removal of milk followed by unilateral breastfeeding ad lib with the same breast offered at every breastfeed in a certain time block ("block feeding").Case presentationsFour cases of over-supply of breast milk are presented. The management and outcome of each case is described.
Conclusion:
Overabundant milk supply is an often under-diagnosed condition in otherwise healthy lactating women. Full drainage and "block feeding" offer an adequate and userfriendly way to normalize milk production and treat symptoms in both mother and child.</description>
			<link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/11</link>		
			<dc:creator>Caroline GA van Veldhuizen-Staas</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2007, 2:11</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 741</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-08-29</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-2-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-08-29</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/13">
            
            <title>Is breastfeeding really invisible, or did the health care system just choose not to notice it?</title>
			<description>There are innumerable myths and misconceptions about breastfeeding that minimize its importance; these often keep health workers from providing effective care to support and protect breastfeeding. They are compounded by lack of basic and applied research, and by the cultural invisibility of breastfeeding in the United States. This paper highlights some of the blind spots and suggests the importance of an approach that places breastfeeding promotion and advocacy within the context of women's lives. As we work to ensure that the health care system provides good breastfeeding care, we need to guard against letting the medicalization of infant feeding keep us from remembering that breastfeeding is something that mothers and children do, in all the aspects of their private and public lives.</description>
			<link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/13</link>		
			<dc:creator>Chris Mulford</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2008, 3:13</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 665</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-04</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-3-13</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-04</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/13">
            
            <title>Breastfeeding practices in a public health field practice area in Sri Lanka: a survival analysis</title>
			<description>Background:
Exclusive breastfeeding up to the completion of the sixth month of age is the national infant feeding recommendation for Sri Lanka. The objective of the present study was to collect data on exclusive breastfeeding up to six months and to describe the association between exclusive breastfeeding and selected socio-demographic factors.
Methods:
A clinic based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Medical Officer of Health area, Beruwala, Sri Lanka in June 2006. Mothers with infants aged 4 to 12 months, attending the 19 child welfare clinics in the area were included in the study. Infants with specific feeding problems (cleft lip and palate and primary lactose intolerance) were excluded. Cluster sampling technique was used and consecutive infants fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled. A total of 219 mothers participated in the study. The statistical tests used were survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional Hazard model).
Results:
All 219 mothers had initiated breastfeeding. The median duration of exclusive breastfeeding was four months (95% CI 3.75, 4.25). The rates of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 and 6 months were 61.6% (135/219) and 15.5% (24/155) respectively. Bivariate analysis showed that the Muslim ethnicity (p = 0.004), lower levels of parental education (p &lt; 0.001) and being an unemployed mother (p = 0.021) were important associations of early cessation of exclusive breastfeeding. At the time of the study, 62% (135/219) of infants were receiving feeds via a bottle and 23% (51/219) were receiving infant formula. Muslim ethnicity was significantly associated with bottle and formula feeding (p &lt; 0.001). Bottle feeding was also significantly higher among mothers with a low level of education and among employed mothers.
Conclusion:
The rate of breastfeeding initiation and exclusive breastfeeding up to the fourth month is very high in Medical Officer of Health area, Beruwala, Sri Lanka. However exclusive breastfeeding up to six months is still low and the prevalence of inappropriate feeding practices is high.</description>
			<link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/13</link>		
			<dc:creator>Suneth B Agampodi, Thilini C Agampodi and Udage Kankanamge   D Piyaseeli</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2007, 2:13</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 570</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-10-11</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-2-13</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-11</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/16">
            
            <title>Transdisciplinary breastfeeding support: Creating program and policy synergy across the reproductive continuum</title>
			<description>This paper was presented at the symposium on Breastfeeding and Feminism: A Focus on Reproductive Health, Rights and Justice. It underscores the power and potential of synergy between and among organizations and individuals supporting breastfeeding, the mother-child dyad, and reproductive health to increase sustainable breastfeeding support. These concepts were brought together to lay the groundwork for working group discussions of synergy in program and policy actions.</description>
			<link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/16</link>		
			<dc:creator>Miriam H Labbok</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2008, 3:16</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 529</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-04</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-3-16</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-04</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/19">
            
            <title>Comparative analysis of ascorbic acid in human milk and infant formula using varied milk delivery systems</title>
			<description>Background:
The expression of human milk for later use is on the rise. Bottle systems are used to deliver the expressed milk. Research has shown that storage of both human milk and artificial baby milk, or infant formula, leads to a loss of ascorbic acid (commonly called Vitamin C). As milk is removed from the bottle during feeding and replaced by ambient air, it is unknown if loss of ascorbic acid occurs during the course of a feeding. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the milk delivery system on levels of ascorbic acid in human milk and infant formula. The objectives are to 1) determine changes in ascorbic acid concentration during a 20 minute "feed," 2) determine if there is a difference in ascorbic acid concentration between delivery systems, and 3) evaluate if any differences are of clinical importance.
Methods:
Commonly available bottles were used for comparison of bottle delivery systems. Mature human milk was standardized to 42 mg/L of ascorbic acid. Infant formula with iron and infant formula with docosahexanoic acid were used for the formula samples. Each sample was analyzed for ascorbic acid concentration at baseline (0), 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes. Each collection of samples was completed in triplicate. Samples were analyzed for ascorbic acid using normal-phase high performance liquid chromatography.
Results:
Ascorbic acid concentration declined in all bottle systems during testing, Differences between the bottle systems were noted. Ascorbic acid concentrations declined to less than 40% of recommended daily intake for infants in 4 of the bottles systems at the 20 minute sampling.  
Conclusions:
The bottle systems used in this study had measurable decreases in the mean concentration of ascorbic acid. More research is needed to determine if the observed decreases are related to lower plasma ascorbic acid concentration in infants exclusively bottle fed. The decrease of ascorbic acid concentration observed in both human milk and infant formula using varied milk delivery systems may be of clinical importance. For infants who rely solely on bottle feeds there may be increased risk of deficiency. Bottle shape, size, and venting should be considered.</description>
			<link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/19</link>		
			<dc:creator>Jimi Francis, Kristy R Rogers, Paul Brewer, Darby D Dickton and Ron Pardini</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2008, 3:19</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 520</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-3-19</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/1/1/24">
            
            <title>Intrapartum epidural analgesia and breastfeeding: a prospective cohort study</title>
			<description>Background:
Anecdotal reports suggest that the addition of fentanyl (an opioid) to epidural analgesia for women during childbirth results in difficulty establishing breastfeeding. The aim of this paper is to determine any association between epidural analgesia and 1) breastfeeding in the first week postpartum and 2) breastfeeding cessation during the first 24 weeks postpartum.
Methods:
A prospective cohort study of 1280 women aged &#8805; 16 years, who gave birth to a single live infant in the Australian Capital Territory in 1997 was conducted. Women completed questionnaires at weeks 1, 8, 16 and 24 postpartum. Breastfeeding information was collected in each of the four surveys and women were categorised as either fully breastfeeding, partially breastfeeding or not breastfeeding at all. Women who had stopped breastfeeding since the previous survey were asked when they stopped.
Results:
In the first week postpartum, 93% of women were either fully or partially breastfeeding their baby and 60% were continuing to breastfeed at 24 weeks. Intrapartum analgesia and type of birth were associated with partial breastfeeding and breastfeeding difficulties in the first postpartum week (p &lt; 0.0001). Analgesia, maternal age and education were associated with breastfeeding cessation in the first 24 weeks (p &lt; 0.0001), with women who had epidurals being more likely to stop breastfeeding than women who used non-pharmacological methods of pain relief (adjusted hazard ratio 2.02, 95% CI 1.53, 2.67).
Conclusion:
Women in this cohort who had epidurals were less likely to fully breastfeed their infant in the few days after birth and more likely to stop breastfeeding in the first 24 weeks. Although this relationship may not be causal, it is important that women at higher risk of breastfeeding cessation are provided with adequate breastfeeding assistance and support.</description>
			<link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/1/1/24</link>		
			<dc:creator>Siranda Torvaldsen, Christine L Roberts, Judy M Simpson, Jane F Thompson and David A Ellwood</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2006, 1:24</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 512</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2006-12-11</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-1-24</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2006-12-11</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/15">
            
            <title>Media and breastfeeding: Friend or foe?</title>
			<description>The mass media have the potential to be powerful friends or foes in promoting breastfeeding. The media could help by putting the issue of breastfeeding on policy agendas and by framing breastfeeding as healthy and normative for baby and mother. Currently, however, it looks as if the media are more often contributing to perceptions that breastfeeding is difficult for mothers and potentially dangerous for babies. This paper presents a brief overview of research on the media and breastfeeding, some insights into the market forces and human psychological factors that may play into media representations of breastfeeding, and strategies to help breastfeeding advocates work more effectively with the media.</description>
			<link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/15</link>		
			<dc:creator>Jane D Brown and Sheila Rose Peuchaud</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2008, 3:15</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 509</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-04</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-3-15</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-04</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/20">
            
            <title>A qualitative study of Western Australian women's perceptions of using a Snoezelen room for breastfeeding during their postpartum hospital stay</title>
			<description>Background:
There is limited evidence on the use of the Snoezelen concept for maternity clients. Snoezelen, a Dutch concept, initiated in the 1970s as a leisure activity for severely disabled people, involves creating an indoor environment using controllable stimuli to enhance comfort and relaxation. These specially designed rooms expose the user to multiple sensory stimulations combining vision, touch, sounds and aromas. The aim of this study was to provide insight into breastfeeding women's experience of using a Snoezelen room during hospitalisation.
Methods:
A qualitative exploratory design was chosen to reveal women's perceptions of using the Snoezelen room. Osborne Park Hospital, the study setting is the second largest public provider of obstetric services in Western Australia. A purposive sample was drawn from breastfeeding women who used the Snoezelen room during their postpartum stay from March 2006 to March 2007. Saturation was achieved after eleven breastfeeding women were interviewed six weeks post discharge. Data analysis involved the constant comparison method.
Results:
Participants entered the room feeling tired and emotional with an unsettled baby and breastfeeding issues aggravated by maternal stress and anxiety. All women indicated they were able to achieve relaxation while in the room and would recommend its use to other breastfeeding mothers. Two key themes revealed how the Snoezelen room facilitated maternal relaxation, which ultimately enhanced the breastfeeding experience. The first theme, "Finding Relaxation for the Breastfeeding Mother" incorporates three subthemes: 'Time out' for mother; Control in own personal space; and a Quiet / calm environment with homelike atmosphere. The second theme, "Enabling Focus on Breastfeeding", occurred after relaxation was achieved and involved four subthemes: Able to get one-on-one attention; Not physically exposed to others; Away from prying, judgemental eyes and Able to safely attempt breastfeeding alone knowing help is nearby.
Conclusions:
Insight into how the Snoezelen room promoted relaxation also highlights what contributes to maternal anxiety during breastfeeding experiences in hospital. The findings offer health professionals the opportunity to consider adopting strategies such as a Snoezelen room in their hospital or being innovative in modifying the postpartum setting to promote relaxation for breastfeeding women.</description>
			<link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/20</link>		
			<dc:creator>Yvonne L Hauck, Lisa Summers, Ellie White and Cheryl Jones</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2008, 3:20</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 503</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-13</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-3-20</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-13</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
