<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>International Breastfeeding Journal - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by International Breastfeeding Journal</description>
        <dc:date>2010-03-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/28" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/1/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/12" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/3">
        <title>The effect of a controlled manipulation of maternal dietary fat intake on medium and long chain fatty acids in human breast milk in Saskatoon, Canada</title>
        <description>Background:
Few studies in recent years have demonstrated the effect of maternal diet on fatty acid composition of human milk.
Methods:
Fourteen free-living lactating women participated in a cross-over dietary intervention study, consuming a low fat diet (17.6% of energy as fat, 14.4% of energy as protein, 68.0% of energy as carbohydrate) and a high fat diet (40.3% of energy as fat, 14.4% of energy as protein, 45.3% of energy as carbohydrate) each for periods of 4 days, in randomised order. Each mother was her own control. Mature milk samples were collected during each period and analysed for medium and long chain fatty acids.
Results:
The concentration of medium chain fatty acids (MCFA), was 13.6% in breast milk for the low fat diet compared to 11.4% for the high fat (p &lt; 0.05). Arachidonic acid (C20:4n-6) levels were significantly higher in breast milk when women consumed the low fat diet. Increased dietary intake of stearic acid (C18:0) and alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3) on the high fat diet significantly increased proportions of these fatty acids in breast milk (p &lt; 0.05) in 4 days.
Conclusions:
Changing maternal dietary fat intake has a rapid response in terms of changes to fatty acids in breast milk.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Roseann Nasser</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alison Stephen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yeow Goh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>M Thomas Clandinin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/4">
        <title>Does opening a milk bank in a neonatal unit change infant feeding practices? A before and after study</title>
        <description>Background:
Donor human milk banks are much more than simple centers for collection, storage, processing, and distribution of donor human milk, as they cover other aspects and represent a real opportunity to promote and support breastfeeding. The aim of our study is to assess the impact that opening a human milk bank has had on the  proportion of infants receiving exclusive breast milk at discharge and other aspects related to feeding children with birth weight &lt; or = 1500 g or &lt; 32 weeks gestation admitted to the neonatal unit.
Methods:
The study included babies of &lt; or = 1500 g or &lt; 32 weeks gestation. Fifty infants born from February to July in 2006, before the opening of the human milk bank, and 54 born from February to July in 2008, after its opening, met inclusive criteria. We collected data about days of hospital stay, hours of life when feeding was started, hours of life when full enteral feeding was attained, the type of milk received during admission, and the type of feeding on discharge.
Results:
Children born in 2008 commenced feeding 16 hours earlier than those born in 2006 (p = 0.00). The proportion of infants receiving exclusive breast milk at discharge was 54% in 2006 and 56% in 2008 (p = 0.87). The number of days they received their mother&apos;s own milk during the first 28 days of life was 24.2 days in 2006, compared to 23.7 days in 2008 (p = 0.70). In 2006, 60% of infants received infant formula at least once in the first 28 days of life, compared to 37% in 2008 (p = 0.01).
Conclusions:
The opening of a donor human milk bank in a neonatal unit did not reduce the proportion of infants exclusively fed with breast milk at discharge, but did reduce the proportion of infants that received infant formula during the first four weeks of life. Also, having donor human milk available enables commencement of enteral feeding earlier.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Maria Isabel Utrera Torres</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmen Medina Lopez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sara Vazquez Roman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Clara Alonso Diaz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jaime Cruz-Rojo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elisa Fernandez Cooke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmen R Pallas Alonso</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/28">
        <title>Association between breastfeeding patterns and diarrhoeal and respiratory illness: A cohort study in Chittagong, Bangladesh</title>
        <description>Background:
In developing countries, infectious diseases such as diarrhoea and acute respiratory infections are the main cause of mortality and morbidity in infants aged less than one year. The importance of exclusive breastfeeding in the prevention of infectious diseases during infancy is well known. Although breastfeeding is almost universal in Bangladesh, the rates of exclusive breastfeeding remain low. This cohort study was designed to compare the prevalence of diarrhoea and acute respiratory infection (ARI) in infants according to their breastfeeding status in a prospective cohort of infants from birth to six months of age.
Methods:
A total of 351 pregnant women were recruited in the Anowara subdistrict of Chittagong. Breastfeeding practices and the 7-day prevalence of diarrhoea and ARI were recorded at monthly home visits. Prevalences were compared using chi-squared tests and logistic regression.
Results:
A total of 272 mother-infant pairs completed the study to six months. Infants who were exclusively breastfed for six months had a significantly lower 7-day prevalence of diarrhoea [AOR for lack of EBF = 2.50 (95%CI 1.10, 5.69), p = 0.03] and a significantly lower 7-day prevalence of ARI [AOR for lack of EBF = 2.31 (95%CI 1.33, 4.00), p &lt; 0.01] than infants who were not exclusively breastfed. However, when the association between patterns of infant feeding (exclusive, predominant and partial breastfeeding) and illness was investigated in more detail, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of diarrhoea between exclusively [6.6% (95% CI 2.8, 10.4)] and predominantly breastfed infants [3.7% (95% CI 0.09, 18.3), (p = 0.56)]. Partially breastfed infants had a higher prevalence of diarrhoea than the others [19.2% (95% CI 10.4, 27.9), (p = 0.01)]. Similarly, although there was a large difference in prevalence in acute respiratory illness between exclusively [54.2% (95%CI 46.6, 61.8)] and predominantly breastfed infants [70.4% (95%CI 53.2, 87.6)] there was no significant difference in the prevalence (p = 0.17).
Conclusion:
The findings suggest that exclusive or predominant breastfeeding can reduce rates of morbidity significantly in this region of rural Bangladesh.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/3/1/28</link>
                <dc:creator>Seema Mihrshahi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wendy Oddy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jennifer Peat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Iqbal Kabir</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2008, 3:28</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-11-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-3-28</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>28</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-11-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/11">
        <title>Overabundant milk supply: an alternate way to intervene by full drainage and block feeding 
</title>
        <description>Background:
Too much or too little milk production are common problems in a lactation consultant&apos;s practice. Whereas underproduction is widely discussed in the lactation literature, overabundant milk supply is not. In my practice I work with women who experience moderate to severe oversupply syndrome. In most cases the syndrome can be successfully treated with full removal of milk followed by unilateral breastfeeding ad lib with the same breast offered at every breastfeed in a certain time block (&quot;block feeding&quot;).Case presentationsFour cases of over-supply of breast milk are presented. The management and outcome of each case is described.
Conclusion:
Overabundant milk supply is an often under-diagnosed condition in otherwise healthy lactating women. Full drainage and &quot;block feeding&quot; offer an adequate and userfriendly way to normalize milk production and treat symptoms in both mother and child.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Caroline van Veldhuizen-Staas</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2007, 2:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-08-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-2-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-08-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/15">
        <title>Dads make a difference: an exploratory study of paternal support for breastfeeding in Perth, Western Australia.</title>
        <description>Background:
The ability to breastfeed and continue the practice requires dedication, commitment, persistence and support. Mothers often need to overcome many obstacles to successfully breastfeed their babies and maintain their balance of home, family and work commitments. Evidence suggests that fathers want to be involved and be part of the parenthood process, including infant feeding. The role transition from couple to family poses challenges to both parents. Sharing the experience of childbirth and supporting each other in the subsequent infant feeding practices is one of those challenges.
Methods:
A qualitative exploratory design was chosen to identify parents&apos; perceptions of what constitutes support for breastfeeding, particularly focusing upon paternal support. Focus groups were conducted with mothers and a focus group, interviews and an online survey were developed for fathers. Thematic analysis was used to identify the main themes.
Results:
From a total of 76 participants, the major theme emerging from mothers&apos; data identified that &quot;Dads do make a difference&quot;. Three sub-themes included: Anticipating needs and getting the job done; Encouragement to do your best; and Paternal determination and commitment, associated with effective partner support. &quot;Wanting to be involved&quot; was identified from fathers&apos; data as the major theme around their needs. Three sub-themes included: Wanting more information; Learning the role; and Being an advocate.
Conclusion:
Sharing the experience of childbirth and supporting each other in the subsequent infant feeding practices was perceived as the best outcome for the majority of new mothers and fathers. Paternal emotional, practical and physical supports were identified as important factors to promote successful breastfeeding and to enrich the experience for the mother and subsequently the father.Trail RegristrationAustralia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12609000667213.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Jenny Tohotoa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bruce Maycock</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yvonne Hauck</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Howat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sharyn Burns</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Colin Binns</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, 4:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/1">
        <title>A prospective study of the effect of delivery type on neonatal weight gain pattern in exclusively breastfed neonates born in Shiraz, Iran </title>
        <description>Background:
In this exploratory study, the contribution of delivery type to the weight gain pattern for full-term infants with exclusive breastfeeding in the first month of infancy was determined. In addition, breastfeeding success among cesarean section (C-section) delivery mothers based on their neonate&apos;s weight gain at the end of the first month of infancy was evaluated.
Methods:
A cohort of 92 neonates born in Shiraz, from July 10 to August 10, 2007 was followed longitudinally. The data were collected during the first month postpartum at three occasions: 3 to 7 days postpartum, 10-21 days postpartum and 24-31 days postpartum.
Results:
Among 92 mothers in this study, 35 (38%) were delivered by C-section. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) showed that delivery type (p &lt; 0.01), receipt of advice about breastfeeding (p = 0.03) and neonate&apos;s age (p &lt; 0.01) significantly affected weight gain. GEE estimated the values of the parameters under study and the testing contribution of each factor to weight gain, leading to the conclusion that gender, parities and maternal education did not contribute to weight gain. The neonate&apos;s weight gain pattern for C-section deliveries lies below that of normal vaginal deliveries until 25 days postpartum, when weight gain for C-section deliveries became higher than that for normal vaginal deliveries.
Conclusions:
Type of delivery contributes strongly to the weight gain pattern in the first month of infancy. In spite of greater weight loss among C-section birth neonates in the first days of life, at the end of the first month neonates showed a similar weight gain. Consequently, mothers with C-section delivery can successfully exclusively breastfeed.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Azadeh Saki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Eshraghian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kazem Mohammad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abbas Rahimi Foroushani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Bordbar</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/4">
        <title>Ultrasound imaging of the lactating breast: Methodology and application</title>
        <description>Ultrasound imaging has been used extensively to detect abnormalities of the non-lactating breast. In contrast, the use of ultrasound for the investigation of pathology of the lactating breast is limited. Recent studies have re-examined the anatomy of the lactating breast highlighting features unique to this phase of breast development. These features should be taken into consideration along with knowledge of common lactation pathologies in order to make an accurate diagnosis when examining the lactating breast. Scanning techniques and ultrasound appearances of the normal lactating breast will be contrasted to those of the non-lactating breast. In addition ultrasound characteristics of common pathologies encountered during lactation will be described.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Donna Geddes</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, 4:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/13">
        <title>The effect of maternal breast variations on neonatal weight gain in the first seven days of life</title>
        <description>Background:
This study aims to examine whether specific maternal breast variations (such as flat nipple, inverted nipple, large breast or/and large nipple) are barriers for weight gain in breastfed infants during the first seven days of life.
Methods:
In this prospective cohort study, 100 healthy term neonates were followed from birth to day seven in two groups; Group A: fifty neonates born to mothers with specified breast variations and Group B: fifty neonates born to mothers without such breast variations (&quot;normal breasts&quot;). All neonates were the first child of their families and there was no sex ratio difference between the two groups. Neonates&apos; weight at birth and day seven were measured and the mean weight differences in the two groups were compared using paired t-test.
Results:
Neonates born to mothers without the specified breast variations had a mean weight gain of (+) 53 &#177; 154.4 g at day seven., Not only there was no increase in the mean weight of neonates in the other group, but they had a mean decrease of weight of (-) 162 &#177; 125.5 g by the seventh day of their life compared to birth weight. Thus, neonates born to mothers without breast variations had significantly greater weight gain than neonates born to the mothers with the specified variations (p &lt; 0.01).
Conclusion:
Breast variation among first-time mothers acts as an important barrier to weight gain among breastfed neonates in the early days of life. Health professionals need skills in the management of breastfeeding among mothers with the specified breast variations, so that mothers are given appropriate advice on how to breastfeed and overcome these problems.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Reza Vazirinejad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shokoofeh Darakhshan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abbas Esmaeili</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shiva Hadadian</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, 4:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-13</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/1/1/24">
        <title>Intrapartum epidural analgesia and breastfeeding: a prospective cohort study</title>
        <description>Background:
Anecdotal reports suggest that the addition of fentanyl (an opioid) to epidural analgesia for women during childbirth results in difficulty establishing breastfeeding. The aim of this paper is to determine any association between epidural analgesia and 1) breastfeeding in the first week postpartum and 2) breastfeeding cessation during the first 24 weeks postpartum.
Methods:
A prospective cohort study of 1280 women aged &#8805; 16 years, who gave birth to a single live infant in the Australian Capital Territory in 1997 was conducted. Women completed questionnaires at weeks 1, 8, 16 and 24 postpartum. Breastfeeding information was collected in each of the four surveys and women were categorised as either fully breastfeeding, partially breastfeeding or not breastfeeding at all. Women who had stopped breastfeeding since the previous survey were asked when they stopped.
Results:
In the first week postpartum, 93% of women were either fully or partially breastfeeding their baby and 60% were continuing to breastfeed at 24 weeks. Intrapartum analgesia and type of birth were associated with partial breastfeeding and breastfeeding difficulties in the first postpartum week (p &lt; 0.0001). Analgesia, maternal age and education were associated with breastfeeding cessation in the first 24 weeks (p &lt; 0.0001), with women who had epidurals being more likely to stop breastfeeding than women who used non-pharmacological methods of pain relief (adjusted hazard ratio 2.02, 95% CI 1.53, 2.67).
Conclusion:
Women in this cohort who had epidurals were less likely to fully breastfeed their infant in the few days after birth and more likely to stop breastfeeding in the first 24 weeks. Although this relationship may not be causal, it is important that women at higher risk of breastfeeding cessation are provided with adequate breastfeeding assistance and support.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/1/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Siranda Torvaldsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christine Roberts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Judy Simpson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Thompson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Ellwood</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2006, 1:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-12-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-1-24</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-12-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/12">
        <title>Cultural beliefs that may discourage breastfeeding among Lebanese women: a qualitative analysis</title>
        <description>Background:
Although the health benefits of breastfeeding are well established, early introduction of formula remains a common practice. Cultural beliefs and practices can have an important impact on breastfeeding. This paper describes some common beliefs that may discourage breastfeeding in Lebanon.
Methods:
Participants were healthy first-time mothers recruited from hospitals throughout Lebanon to participate in a study on usage patterns of a telephone hotline for postpartum support. The hotline was available to mothers for the first four months postpartum and patterns of usage, as well as questions asked were recorded. Thematic analysis of the content of questions which referred to cultural beliefs and practices related to breastfeeding was conducted.
Results:
Twenty four percent of the 353 women enrolled in the study called the hotline, and 50% of the calls included questions about breastfeeding. Mothers expressed concern about having adequate amounts of breast milk or the quality of their breast milk. Concerns that the mother could potentially harm her infant though breastfeeding were rooted in a number of cultural beliefs. Having an inherited inability to produce milk, having &quot;bad milk&quot;, and transmission of abdominal cramps to infants through breast milk were among the beliefs that were expressed. Although the researchers live and work in Lebanon, they were not aware of many of the beliefs that are reported in this study.
Conclusion:
There are a number of cultural beliefs that could potentially discourage breastfeeding among Lebanese women. Understanding and addressing local beliefs and customs can help clinicians to provide more culturally appropriate counselling about breastfeeding.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Hibah Osman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lama El Zein</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Livia Wick</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, 4:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-12</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
