<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>International Breastfeeding Journal - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by International Breastfeeding Journal</description>
        <dc:date>2012-05-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/1/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/7" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/10">
        <title>Breastfeeding and HIV: experiences from a decade of prevention of postnatal HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa
</title>
        <description>Infant feeding by HIV-infected mothers has been a major global public health dilemma and a highly controversial matter. The controversy is reflected in the different sets of WHO infant feeding guidelines that have been issued over the last two decades. This thematic series, &apos;Infant feeding and HIV: lessons learnt and ways ahead&apos; highlights the multiple challenges that HIV-infected women, infant feeding counsellors and health systems have encountered trying to translate and implement the shifting infant feeding recommendations in different local contexts in sub-Saharan Africa. As a background for the papers making up the series, this editorial reviews the changes in the guidelines in view of the roll out of prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) programmes in sub-Saharan Africa between 2001 and 2010.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Karen Marie Moland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marina de Paoli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dan Sellen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Penny van Esterik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sebalda Leshabari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Astrid Blystad</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-10-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-10</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-5-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-10-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/11">
        <title>Overabundant milk supply: an alternate way to intervene by full drainage and block feeding 
</title>
        <description>Background:
Too much or too little milk production are common problems in a lactation consultant&apos;s practice. Whereas underproduction is widely discussed in the lactation literature, overabundant milk supply is not. In my practice I work with women who experience moderate to severe oversupply syndrome. In most cases the syndrome can be successfully treated with full removal of milk followed by unilateral breastfeeding ad lib with the same breast offered at every breastfeed in a certain time block (&quot;block feeding&quot;).Case presentationsFour cases of over-supply of breast milk are presented. The management and outcome of each case is described.
Conclusion:
Overabundant milk supply is an often under-diagnosed condition in otherwise healthy lactating women. Full drainage and &quot;block feeding&quot; offer an adequate and userfriendly way to normalize milk production and treat symptoms in both mother and child.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Caroline van Veldhuizen-Staas</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2007, null:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-08-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-2-11</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-2-11-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-08-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/1/1/5">
        <title>Mental health, attachment and breastfeeding: implications for adopted children and their mothers</title>
        <description>Breastfeeding an adopted child has previously been discussed as something that is nice to do but without potential for significant benefit. This paper reviews the evidence in physiological and behavioural research, that breastfeeding can play a significant role in developing the attachment relationship between child and mother. As illustrated in the case studies presented, in instances of adoption and particularly where the child has experienced abuse or neglect, the impact of breastfeeding can be considerable. Breastfeeding may assist attachment development via the provision of regular intimate interaction between mother and child; the calming, relaxing and analgesic impact of breastfeeding on children; and the stress relieving and maternal sensitivity promoting influence of breastfeeding on mothers. The impact of breastfeeding as observed in cases of adoption has applicability to all breastfeeding situations, but may be especially relevant to other at risk dyads, such as those families with a history of intergenerational relationship trauma; this deserves further investigation.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/1/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Karleen Gribble</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2006, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-03-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-1-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-1-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-03-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/4">
        <title>Ultrasound imaging of the lactating breast: Methodology and application</title>
        <description>Ultrasound imaging has been used extensively to detect abnormalities of the non-lactating breast. In contrast, the use of ultrasound for the investigation of pathology of the lactating breast is limited. Recent studies have re-examined the anatomy of the lactating breast highlighting features unique to this phase of breast development. These features should be taken into consideration along with knowledge of common lactation pathologies in order to make an accurate diagnosis when examining the lactating breast. Scanning techniques and ultrasound appearances of the normal lactating breast will be contrasted to those of the non-lactating breast. In addition ultrasound characteristics of common pathologies encountered during lactation will be described.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Donna Geddes</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-4</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Ultrasound investigation of lactating breast</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Review of features unique to the lactating breast, that have been discovered using ultrasound imaging, highlighting the use of ultrasound to detect abnormalities.

</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-4-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/9">
        <title>An observational study of associations among maternal fluids during parturition, neonatal output, and breastfed newborn weight loss</title>
        <description>Background:
Newborn weight measurements are used as a key indicator of breastfeeding adequacy. The purpose of this study was to explore non-feeding factors that might be related to newborn weight loss. The relationship between the intravenous fluids women receive during parturition (the act of giving birth, including time in labour or prior to a caesarean section) and their newborn&apos;s weight loss during the first 72 hours postpartum was the primary interest.
Methods:
In this observational cohort study, we collected data about maternal oral and IV fluids during labour or before a caesarean section. Participants (n = 109) weighed their newborns every 12 hours for the first three days then daily to Day 14, and they weighed neonatal output (voids and stools) for three days.
Results:
At 60 hours (nadir), mean newborn weight loss was 6.57% (SD 2.51; n = 96, range 1.83-13.06%). When groups, based on maternal fluids, were compared (&#8804;1200 mls [n = 21] versus &gt; 1200 [n = 53]), newborns lost 5.51% versus 6.93% (p = 0.03), respectively. For the first 24 hours, bivariate analyses show positive relationships between a) neonatal output and percentage of newborn weight lost (r(96) = 0.493, p &lt; 0.001); and b) maternal IV fluids (final 2 hours) and neonatal output (r(42) = 0.383, p = 0.012). At 72 hours, there was a positive correlation between grams of weight lost and all maternal fluids (r(75) = 0.309, p = 0.007).
Conclusions:
Timing and amounts of maternal IV fluids appear correlated to neonatal output and newborn weight loss. Neonates appear to experience diuresis and correct their fluid status in the first 24 hours. We recommend a measurement at 24 hours, instead of birth weight, for baseline when assessing weight change. Because practices can differ between maternity settings, we further suggest that clinicians should collect and analyze data from dyads in their care to determine an optimal baseline measurement.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Joy Noel-Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>A Woodend</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wendy Peterson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Gibb</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dianne Groll</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2011, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-08-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-6-9</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Maternal IV fluids affect newborn weight loss</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>The volume of intravenous fluids received by women during labour impacts newborn birth weight, meaning weight loss in the first 24 hours post delivery may not be a true measure of early breastfeeding success.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-6-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-08-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/5">
        <title>Constraints to exclusive breastfeeding practice among breastfeeding mothers in Southwest Nigeria: Implications for scaling up</title>
        <description>Background:
The practice of exclusive breastfeeding is still low despite the associated benefits. Improving the uptake and appropriating the benefits will require an understanding of breastfeeding as an embodied experience within a social context. This study investigates breastfeeding practices and experiences of nursing mothers and the roles of grandmothers, as well as the work-related constraints affecting nurses in providing quality support for breastfeeding mothers in Southwest Nigeria.
Methods:
Using a concurrent mixed method approach, a structured questionnaire was administered to 200 breastfeeding mothers. In-depth interviews were also held with breastfeeding mothers (11), nurses (10) and a focus group discussion session with grandmothers.
Results:
Breastfeeding was perceived as essential to baby&apos;s health. It strengthens the physical and spiritual bond between mothers and their children. Exclusive breastfeeding was considered essential but demanding. Only a small proportion (19%) of the nursing mothers practiced exclusive breastfeeding. The survey showed the major constraints to exclusive breastfeeding to be: the perception that babies continued to be hungry after breastfeeding (29%); maternal health problems (26%); fear of babies becoming addicted to breast milk (26%); pressure from mother-in-law (25%); pains in the breast (25%); and the need to return to work (24%). In addition, the qualitative findings showed that significant others played dual roles with consequences on breastfeeding practices. The desire to practice exclusive breastfeeding was often compromised shortly after child delivery. Poor feeding, inadequate support from husband and conflicting positions from the significant others were dominant constraints. The nurses decried the effects of their workload on providing quality supports for nursing mothers.
Conclusion:
Breastfeeding mothers are faced with multiple challenges as they strive to practice exclusive breastfeeding. Thus, scaling up of exclusive breastfeeding among mothers requires concerted efforts at the macro, meso and micro levels of the Nigerian society.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Ojo Agunbiade</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Opeyemi Ogunleye</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2012, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-7-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-7-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/8">
        <title>Milk sharing: from private practice to public pursuit</title>
        <description>After only six months, a commerce-free internet-based milk-sharing model is operating in nearly 50 countries, connecting mothers who are able to donate breast milk with the caregivers of babies who need breast milk. Some public health authorities have condemned this initiative out of hand. Although women have always shared their milk, in many settings infant formula has become the &quot;obvious&quot; alternative to a mother&apos;s own milk. Yet an internationally endorsed recommendation supports mother-to-mother milk sharing as the best option in place of a birth mother&apos;s milk. Why then this rejection? Several possibilities come to mind: 1) ignorance and prejudice surrounding shared breast milk; 2) a perceived challenge to the medical establishment of a system where mothers exercise independent control; and 3) concern that mother-to-mother milk sharing threatens donor milk banks. We are not saying that milk sharing is risk-free or that the internet is an ideal platform for promoting it. Rather, we are encouraging health authorities to examine this initiative closely, determine what is happening, and provide resources to make mother-to-mother milk sharing as safe as possible. Health authorities readily concede that life is fraught with risk; accordingly, they promote risk-reduction and harm-minimisation strategies. Why should it be any different for babies lacking their own mothers&apos; milk? The more that is known about the risks of substituting for breast milk, the more reasonable parental choice to use donor milk becomes. We believe that the level of intrinsic risk is manageable through informed sharing. If undertaken, managed and evaluated appropriately, this made-by-mothers model shows considerable potential for expanding the world&apos;s supply of human milk and improving the health of children.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/6/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>James Akre</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karleen Gribble</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maureen Minchin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2011, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-06-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-6-8</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-6-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-06-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/6">
        <title>Enquiry analysis and user opinion of the Drugs in
Breastmilk Helpline: a prospective study</title>
        <description>Background:
Since breastfeeding is universally recognised as the ideal way to feed infants, it isunderstandable, and at times inevitable, that breastfeeding mothers will want, or be required,to take medication. To meet the information demands of breastfeeding mothers andhealthcare professionals, a UK charity, The Breastfeeding Network, established a freetelephone helpline to answer queries on medicines in breastmilk. This study reports on theenquiries received by the Drugs in Breastmilk Helpline and user opinion of the service.
Methods:
All enquirers to the Helpline between December 2010 and January 2011 were asked if theycould be contacted in 2 to 4 weeks to provide more information on their experience of usingthe service. A combination of telephone semi-structured interviews and email surveys wereused depending on whether the enquiry originated via telephone or email.
Results:
Information was gained from 101 participants; 77 women and 24 healthcare professionals.Women reported high levels of service satisfaction (94%, n = 72/77) and healthcareprofessionals found the information provided useful (92%, n = 22/24). Women used theservice for reassurance or because they had received conflicting information or distrustedhealthcare professional advice. Healthcare professionals often could not answer questions ortook a cautious approach to recommendation (i.e. advised avoidance of medicines whilstbreastfeeding); this was often at odds to advice given by staff from the Helpline. Healthcareprofessionals did not routinely access resources to answer questions, but when they did,showed a lack of confidence in data interpretation.
Conclusions:
The Breastfeeding Networks&apos; Drugs in Breastmilk Helpline provides an important service tobreastfeeding women and healthcare staff to make informed decisions on medicine takingwhilst breastfeeding. Healthcare professional uncertainty and incorrect advice given tobreastfeeding women suggests that healthcare professional education needs improving andthat greater use of specialist services should be encouraged.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Paul Rutter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wendy Jones</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2012, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-7-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-7-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/6">
        <title>A new paradigm for depression in new mothers: the central role of inflammation and how breastfeeding and anti-inflammatory treatments protect maternal mental health </title>
        <description>Background:
Research in the field of psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) has revealed that depression is associated with inflammation manifested by increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines.DiscussionThe old paradigm described inflammation as simply one of many risk factors for depression. The new paradigm is based on more recent research that has indicated that physical and psychological stressors increase inflammation. These recent studies constitute an important shift in the depression paradigm: inflammation is not simply a risk factor; it is the risk factor that underlies all the others. Moreover, inflammation explains why psychosocial, behavioral and physical risk factors increase the risk of depression. This is true for depression in general and for postpartum depression in particular. Puerperal women are especially vulnerable to these effects because their levels of proinflammatory cytokines significantly increase during the last trimester of pregnancy &#8211; a time when they are also at high risk for depression. Moreover, common experiences of new motherhood, such as sleep disturbance, postpartum pain, and past or current psychological trauma, act as stressors that cause proinflammatory cytokine levels to rise. Breastfeeding has a protective effect on maternal mental health because it attenuates stress and modulates the inflammatory response. However, breastfeeding difficulties, such as nipple pain, can increase the risk of depression and must be addressed promptly.
Conclusion:
PNI research suggests two goals for the prevention and treatment of postpartum depression: reducing maternal stress and reducing inflammation. Breastfeeding and exercise reduce maternal stress and are protective of maternal mood. In addition, most current treatments for depression are anti-inflammatory. These include long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, cognitive therapy, St. John&apos;s wort, and conventional antidepressants.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Kathleen Kendall-Tackett</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2007, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-2-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-2-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-03-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/7">
        <title>Reasons given by mothers for discontinuing breastfeeding in Iran</title>
        <description>Background:
We have previously shown that in Iran, only 28% of infants were exclusively breastfed at six months, despite a high prevalence of breastfeeding at two years of age. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the reasons women discontinued exclusive breastfeeding.MethodThis retrospective study was based on questionnaires and interviews with 63,071 mothers of infants up to 24 months of age, divided into two populations: infants younger than six months and six months or older. The data were collected in 2005-2006 from all 30 provinces of Iran.
Results:
Only 5.3% of infants less than six months of age stopped breastfeeding (mean age of 3.2 months); more commonly in urban than rural areas. The most frequently cited reasons mothers gave for discontinuing exclusive breastfeeding were physicians&apos; recommendation (54%) and insufficient breast milk (self-perceived or true, 28%). Breastfeeding was common after six months of age: only 11% of infants discontinued breastfeeding, at a mean of 13.8 months. The most common reason for discontinuation at this age was insufficient breast milk (self-perceived or true, 45%). Maternal illness or medication (10%), infant illness (6%), and return to work (3%) were uncommon causes. Use of a pacifier was correlated with breastfeeding discontinuation. Maternal age and education was not associated with duration of breastfeeding. Multivariate analysis showed that using a pacifier and formula or other bottle feeding increased the risk of early cessation of breastfeeding.
Conclusions:
Physicians and other health professionals have an important role to play in encouraging and supporting mothers to maintain breastfeeding.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/7/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Beheshteh Olang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abtin Heidarzadeh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Birgitta Strandvik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Agneta Yngve</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2012, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-7-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1746-4358-7-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

