<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>International Breastfeeding Journal - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by International Breastfeeding Journal</description>
        <dc:date>2010-03-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/11" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/4">
        <title>Does opening a milk bank in a neonatal unit change infant feeding practices? A before and after study</title>
        <description>Background:
Donor human milk banks are much more than simple centers for collection, storage, processing, and distribution of donor human milk, as they cover other aspects and represent a real opportunity to promote and support breastfeeding. The aim of our study is to assess the impact that opening a human milk bank has had on the  proportion of infants receiving exclusive breast milk at discharge and other aspects related to feeding children with birth weight &lt; or = 1500 g or &lt; 32 weeks gestation admitted to the neonatal unit.
Methods:
The study included babies of &lt; or = 1500 g or &lt; 32 weeks gestation. Fifty infants born from February to July in 2006, before the opening of the human milk bank, and 54 born from February to July in 2008, after its opening, met inclusive criteria. We collected data about days of hospital stay, hours of life when feeding was started, hours of life when full enteral feeding was attained, the type of milk received during admission, and the type of feeding on discharge.
Results:
Children born in 2008 commenced feeding 16 hours earlier than those born in 2006 (p = 0.00). The proportion of infants receiving exclusive breast milk at discharge was 54% in 2006 and 56% in 2008 (p = 0.87). The number of days they received their mother&apos;s own milk during the first 28 days of life was 24.2 days in 2006, compared to 23.7 days in 2008 (p = 0.70). In 2006, 60% of infants received infant formula at least once in the first 28 days of life, compared to 37% in 2008 (p = 0.01).
Conclusions:
The opening of a donor human milk bank in a neonatal unit did not reduce the proportion of infants exclusively fed with breast milk at discharge, but did reduce the proportion of infants that received infant formula during the first four weeks of life. Also, having donor human milk available enables commencement of enteral feeding earlier.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Maria Isabel Utrera Torres</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmen Medina Lopez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sara Vazquez Roman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Clara Alonso Diaz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jaime Cruz-Rojo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elisa Fernandez Cooke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmen R Pallas Alonso</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/3">
        <title>The effect of a controlled manipulation of maternal dietary fat intake on medium and long chain fatty acids in human breast milk in Saskatoon, Canada</title>
        <description>Background:
Few studies in recent years have demonstrated the effect of maternal diet on fatty acid composition of human milk.
Methods:
Fourteen free-living lactating women participated in a cross-over dietary intervention study, consuming a low fat diet (17.6% of energy as fat, 14.4% of energy as protein, 68.0% of energy as carbohydrate) and a high fat diet (40.3% of energy as fat, 14.4% of energy as protein, 45.3% of energy as carbohydrate) each for periods of 4 days, in randomised order. Each mother was her own control. Mature milk samples were collected during each period and analysed for medium and long chain fatty acids.
Results:
The concentration of medium chain fatty acids (MCFA), was 13.6% in breast milk for the low fat diet compared to 11.4% for the high fat (p &lt; 0.05). Arachidonic acid (C20:4n-6) levels were significantly higher in breast milk when women consumed the low fat diet.  Increased dietary intake of stearic acid (C18:0) and alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3) on the high fat diet significantly increased proportions of these fatty acids in breast milk (p &lt; 0.05) in 4 days.
Conclusions:
Changing maternal dietary fat intake has a rapid response in terms of changes to fatty acids in breast milk.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Roseann Nasser</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alison Stephen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yeow Goh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>M Thomas Clandinin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/2">
        <title>Infant feeding modalities addressed in two different ways in Eastern Uganda</title>
        <description>Background:
Durations of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and predominant breastfeeding (PBF) from two different assessments, among the same mother-infant population, were investigated to determine the degree to which the assessments yielded overlapping results.
Methods:
Thirty Ugandan mother-infant pairs were followed up weekly from birth to three months of age with weekly short-time feeding recall: the 24-hour recall asked prior to the 1-week recall. In addition, at week 6 and 12 dietary recalls since-birth were conducted. Variables for the duration of EBF and PBF were created from the short-time feeding recalls and the dietary recalls since-birth, respectively. Mean durations of EBF and PBF from the two assessments were compared with Kaplan Meier analysis at week 6 and 12. Reproducibility of dietary recall instruments was also assessed.
Results:
At six weeks postpartum the mean durations of EBF were 0.50 weeks (95% CI: 0, 1.02) according to the weekly short-time recalls and 1.51 weeks (95% CI: 0.66, 2.35) according to the recall since-birth (Mantel-Cox test, p = 0.049). The mean durations of PBF were 4.07 weeks (95% CI: 3.38, 4.77) according to the frequent short-time recalls and 4.50 weeks (95% CI: 3.93, 5.07) according to the recall since-birth, (Mantel-Cox-test, p = 0.82). At twelve weeks the mean durations of EBF were 0.5 weeks (95% CI: 0, 1.1) according to the weekly short-time recalls and 1.4 weeks (95% CI: 0.1, 2.7) according to the recall since-birth (Mantel-Cox-test, p = 0.15). The mean durations of PBF were 5.2 weeks (95% CI: 3.9, 6.5) according to the weekly short-time recalls and 6.6 weeks (95% CI: 5.4, 7.8) according to recall since-birth (Mantel-Cox-test, p = 0.20). Reports of feeding categories and early feeding practices showed high reproducibility.
Conclusion:
Comparing duration of EBF and PBF in this group of mother-infant pairs showed overlapping results from the weekly short-time assessment and the recall since-birth at twelve weeks, with the latter yielding slightly longer duration of the respective feeding modalities. The retrospective recall since-birth could be assessed as a cost-reducing tool compared to the frequent follow-up addressing duration of respective infant feeding modalities for evaluation of programmes promoting safer infant feeding practices.Trial registrationThe study was part of formative studies for the ongoing study PROMISE EBF registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00397150.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Ingunn Engebretsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rebecca Shanmugam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>A. Elisabeth Sommerfelt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Tumwine</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thorkild Tylleskar</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/1">
        <title>A prospective study of the effect of delivery type on neonatal weight gain pattern in exclusively breastfed neonates born in Shiraz, Iran </title>
        <description>Background:
In this exploratory study, the contribution of delivery type to the weight gain pattern for full-term infants with exclusive breastfeeding in the first month of infancy was determined. In addition, breastfeeding success among cesarean section (C-section) delivery mothers based on their neonate&apos;s weight gain at the end of the first month of infancy was evaluated.
Methods:
A cohort of 92 neonates born in Shiraz, from July 10 to August 10, 2007 was followed longitudinally. The data were collected during the first month postpartum at three occasions: 3 to 7 days postpartum, 10-21 days postpartum and 24-31 days postpartum.
Results:
Among 92 mothers in this study, 35 (38%) were delivered by C-section. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) showed that delivery type (p &lt; 0.01), receipt of advice about breastfeeding (p = 0.03) and neonate&apos;s age (p &lt; 0.01) significantly affected weight gain. GEE estimated the values of the parameters under study and the testing contribution of each factor to weight gain, leading to the conclusion that gender, parities and maternal education did not contribute to weight gain. The neonate&apos;s weight gain pattern for C-section deliveries lies below that of normal vaginal deliveries until 25 days postpartum, when weight gain for C-section deliveries became higher than that for normal vaginal deliveries.
Conclusions:
Type of delivery contributes strongly to the weight gain pattern in the first month of infancy. In spite of greater weight loss among C-section birth neonates in the first days of life, at the end of the first month neonates showed a similar weight gain. Consequently, mothers with C-section delivery can successfully exclusively breastfeed.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Azadeh Saki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Eshraghian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kazem Mohammad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abbas Rahimi Foroushani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Bordbar</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/16">
        <title>Social support during childbirth as a catalyst for early breastfeeding initiation for first-time Nigerian Mothers


</title>
        <description>Background:
Initiation of breastfeeding can be difficult in a busy maternity centre with inadequate manpower and social support. This study aims to explore the role of psychosocial support offered by companions on breastfeeding initiation among first-time mothers.
Methods:
This is a secondary data analysis of a randomised controlled trial conducted among women attending the antenatal clinic of the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria in 2007. Those in the experimental group were asked to bring someone of their choice to the labour room to act as a companion; the comparison group received standard care. The results of 209 HIV negative women who had vaginal births were analysed. The main outcome measure was time to initiation of breastfeeding after childbirth.
Results:
Of the total, 94 had companions during labour while 115 did not have a companion. The median time to breastfeeding initiation was significantly shorter in those with companions compared to controls (16 vs. 54 minutes; p &lt; 0.01). The cumulative survival analysis indicated that all in the treatment group had initiated breastfeeding by 26 minutes, while among the control group none had commenced at 30 minutes post-delivery with some as late as 12 hours. After Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for possible confounders, the outcome still showed a significant hazard ratio of 207.8 (95%CI 49.2, 878.0; p &lt; 0.01) among women who were supported by a companion.
Conclusion:
Use of companions during labour is associated with earlier time to breastfeeding initiation among first-time mothers in Nigeria.Trial RegistrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12609000994280.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Imran Morhason-Bello</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Babatunde Adedokun</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Oladosu Ojengbede</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, 4:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-16</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/15">
        <title>Dads make a difference: an exploratory study of paternal support for breastfeeding in Perth, Western Australia.</title>
        <description>Background:
The ability to breastfeed and continue the practice requires dedication, commitment, persistence and support. Mothers often need to overcome many obstacles to successfully breastfeed their babies and maintain their balance of home, family and work commitments. Evidence suggests that fathers want to be involved and be part of the parenthood process, including infant feeding. The role transition from couple to family poses challenges to both parents. Sharing the experience of childbirth and supporting each other in the subsequent infant feeding practices is one of those challenges.
Methods:
A qualitative exploratory design was chosen to identify parents&apos; perceptions of what constitutes support for breastfeeding, particularly focusing upon paternal support. Focus groups were conducted with mothers and a focus group, interviews and an online survey were developed for fathers. Thematic analysis was used to identify the main themes.
Results:
From a total of 76 participants, the major theme emerging from mothers&apos; data identified that &quot;Dads do make a difference&quot;. Three sub-themes included: Anticipating needs and getting the job done; Encouragement to do your best; and Paternal determination and commitment, associated with effective partner support. &quot;Wanting to be involved&quot; was identified from fathers&apos; data as the major theme around their needs. Three sub-themes included: Wanting more information; Learning the role; and Being an advocate.
Conclusion:
Sharing the experience of childbirth and supporting each other in the subsequent infant feeding practices was perceived as the best outcome for the majority of new mothers and fathers. Paternal emotional, practical and physical supports were identified as important factors to promote successful breastfeeding and to enrich the experience for the mother and subsequently the father.Trail RegristrationAustralia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12609000667213.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Jenny Tohotoa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bruce Maycock</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yvonne Hauck</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Howat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sharyn Burns</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Colin Binns</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, 4:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/14">
        <title>Exclusive breastfeeding in Sri Lanka: problems of interpretation of reported rates</title>
        <description>Accurate interpretation of reported breastfeeding rates is essential in understanding the true picture of a country&apos;s breastfeeding status. In Sri Lanka, where the reported exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rate among infants aged from 0 to 5 months is 75%, accurate understanding of this rate is of the utmost importance. The danger of misinterpreting the data and assuming that Sri Lanka has achieved a high EBF rate is that health workers begin to believe that no further effort should be made in this area. This is very dangerous as the potential to further improve rates of EBF will not be addressed. We discuss the interpretation of survey data and various definitions used in the relevant literature. We strongly recommend that interpretation of EBF rates should be done only after careful evaluation of the definitions and survey methods used.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Suneth Agampodi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thilini Agampodi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Avanthi de Silva</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, 4:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-14</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/13">
        <title>The effect of maternal breast variations on neonatal weight gain in the first seven days of life</title>
        <description>Background:
This study aims to examine whether specific maternal breast variations (such as flat nipple, inverted nipple, large breast or/and large nipple) are barriers for weight gain in breastfed infants during the first seven days of life.
Methods:
In this prospective cohort study, 100 healthy term neonates were followed from birth to day seven in two groups; Group A: fifty neonates born to mothers with specified breast variations and Group B: fifty neonates born to mothers without such breast variations (&quot;normal breasts&quot;). All neonates were the first child of their families and there was no sex ratio difference between the two groups. Neonates&apos; weight at birth and day seven were measured and the mean weight differences in the two groups were compared using paired t-test.
Results:
Neonates born to mothers without the specified breast variations had a mean weight gain of (+) 53 &#177; 154.4 g at day seven., Not only there was no increase in the mean weight of neonates in the other group, but they had a mean decrease of weight of (-) 162 &#177; 125.5 g by the seventh day of their life compared to birth weight. Thus, neonates born to mothers without breast variations had significantly greater weight gain than neonates born to the mothers with the specified variations (p &lt; 0.01).
Conclusion:
Breast variation among first-time mothers acts as an important barrier to weight gain among breastfed neonates in the early days of life. Health professionals need skills in the management of breastfeeding among mothers with the specified breast variations, so that mothers are given appropriate advice on how to breastfeed and overcome these problems.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Reza Vazirinejad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shokoofeh Darakhshan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abbas Esmaeili</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shiva Hadadian</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, 4:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-13</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/12">
        <title>Cultural beliefs that may discourage breastfeeding among Lebanese women: a qualitative analysis</title>
        <description>Background:
Although the health benefits of breastfeeding are well established, early introduction of formula remains a common practice. Cultural beliefs and practices can have an important impact on breastfeeding. This paper describes some common beliefs that may discourage breastfeeding in Lebanon.
Methods:
Participants were healthy first-time mothers recruited from hospitals throughout Lebanon to participate in a study on usage patterns of a telephone hotline for postpartum support. The hotline was available to mothers for the first four months postpartum and patterns of usage, as well as questions asked were recorded. Thematic analysis of the content of questions which referred to cultural beliefs and practices related to breastfeeding was conducted.
Results:
Twenty four percent of the 353 women enrolled in the study called the hotline, and 50% of the calls included questions about breastfeeding. Mothers expressed concern about having adequate amounts of breast milk or the quality of their breast milk. Concerns that the mother could potentially harm her infant though breastfeeding were rooted in a number of cultural beliefs. Having an inherited inability to produce milk, having &quot;bad milk&quot;, and transmission of abdominal cramps to infants through breast milk were among the beliefs that were expressed. Although the researchers live and work in Lebanon, they were not aware of many of the beliefs that are reported in this study.
Conclusion:
There are a number of cultural beliefs that could potentially discourage breastfeeding among Lebanese women. Understanding and addressing local beliefs and customs can help clinicians to provide more culturally appropriate counselling about breastfeeding.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Hibah Osman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lama El Zein</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Livia Wick</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, 4:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-12</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/11">
        <title>Exploring the impact of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative on trends in exclusive breastfeeding</title>
        <description>Background:
The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) seeks to support breastfeeding initiation in maternity services. This study uses country-level data to examine the relationship between BFHI programming and trends in exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in 14 developing countries.
Methods:
Demographic and Health Surveys and UNICEF BFHI Reports provided EBF and BFHI data. Because country programs were initiated in different years, data points were realigned to the year that the first Baby-Friendly hospital was certified in that country. Pre-and post-implementation time periods were analyzed using fixed effects models to account for grouping of data by country, and compared to assess differences in trends.
Results:
Statistically significant upward trends in EBF under two months and under six months, as assessed by whether fitted trends had slopes significantly different from 0, were observed only during the period following BFHI implementation, and not before. BFHI implementation was associated with average annual increases of 1.54 percentage points in the rate of EBF of infants under two months (p &lt; 0.001) and 1.11-percentage points in the rate of EBF of infants under six months (p &lt; 0.001); however, these rates were not statistically different from pre-BFHI trends.
Conclusion:
BFHI implementation was associated with a statistically significant annual increase in rates of EBF in the countries under study; however, small sample sizes may have contributed to the fact that results do not demonstrate a significant difference from pre-BFHI trends. Further research is needed to consider trends according to the percentages of Baby-Friendly facilities, percent of all births occurring in these facilities, and continued compliance with the program.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Sheryl Abrahams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Miriam Labbok</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, 4:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
