<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>International Breastfeeding Journal - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by International Breastfeeding Journal</description>
        <dc:date>2010-08-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/16" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/9">
        <title>Development and evaluation of a self care program on breastfeeding in Japan: A quasi-experimental study</title>
        <description>Background:
Although the importance of breastfeeding is well known in Japan, in recent years less than 50% of mothers were fully breastfeeding at one month after birth. The purpose of this study was to develop a self-care program for breastfeeding aimed at increasing mothers&apos; breastfeeding confidence and to evaluate its effectiveness.
Methods:
A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was conducted in Japan. The intervention, a breastfeeding self-care program, was created to improve mothers&apos; self-efficacy for breastfeeding. This Breastfeeding Self-Care Program included: information on the advantages and basics of breastfeeding, a breastfeeding checklist to evaluate breastfeeding by mothers and midwives, and a pamphlet and audiovisual materials on breastfeeding. Mothers received this program during their postpartum hospital stay.A convenience sample of 117 primiparous women was recruited at two clinical sites from October 2007 to March 2008. The intervention group (n = 55), who gave birth in three odd-numbered months, received standard care and the Breastfeeding Self-Care Program while the control group (n = 62) gave birth in three even numbered months and received standard breastfeeding care.To evaluate the effectiveness of the Breastfeeding Self-Care Program, breastfeeding self-efficacy and breastfeeding rate were measured early postpartum, before the intervention, and after the intervention at one month postpartum. The study used the Japanese version of The Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form (BSES-SF) to measure self-efficacy.
Results:
The BSES-SF score of the intervention group rose significantly from 34.8 at early postpartum to 49.9 at one month after birth (p &lt; 0.01). For the control group, the score rose from 39.5 at early postpartum to 46.5 at one month after birth (p = 0.03). The early postpartum fully breastfeeding rate was 90% for the intervention group and 89% for the control group. At one month postpartum, the fully breastfeeding rate declined significantly to 65% for the control group compared to 90% (p = 0.02) for the intervention group.
Conclusion:
Results indicate that the Breastfeeding Self-Care Program increased mothers&apos; self-efficacy for breastfeeding and had a positive effect on the continuation of breastfeeding.Trial Registration Number: UMIN000003517</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Masayo Awano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Keiko Shimada</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/8">
        <title>A qualitative study of the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding by health professionals in Niamey, Niger</title>
        <description>Background:
The practice of exclusive breastfeeding depends on various factors related to both mothers and their environment, including the services delivered by health professionals. It is known that support and counseling by health professionals can improve rates, early initiation and total duration of breastfeeding, particularly exclusive breastfeeding. Mothers&apos; decisions are influenced by health professionals&apos; advice. However, in Niger the practice of exclusive breastfeeding is almost non-existent.The purpose of this exploratory study, of which some results are presented here, was to document health professionals&apos; attitudes and practices with regard to exclusive breastfeeding promotion in hospital settings in the urban community of Niamey, Niger.
Methods:
Fieldwork was conducted in Niamey, Niger. A qualitative approach was employed. Health professionals&apos; practices were observed in a sample of frontline public healthcare facilities.
Results:
The field observation results presented here indicate that exclusive breastfeeding is not promoted in healthcare facilities because the health professionals do not encourage it and their practices are inappropriate. Some still have limited knowledge or are misinformed about this practice or do not believe in it. They do not systematically discuss exclusive breastfeeding with mothers, or they mention it only briefly and without giving any explanation. Worse still, some encourage the use of breast milk substitutes, which are frequently promoted in healthcare facilities. Thus mothers often receive contradictory messages.
Conclusion:
The results suggest the need to train or retrain health professionals with regard to exclusive breastfeeding, and regularly supervise their activities.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Aissata Moussa Abba</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria De Koninck</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne-Marie Hamelin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/7">
        <title>Determinants of breastfeeding initiation among mothers in Kuwait</title>
        <description>Background:
Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended as the optimal way to feed infants for the first six months of life. While overall breastfeeding rates are high, exclusive breastfeeding is relatively uncommon among Middle Eastern women. The objective of this study was to identify the incidence of breastfeeding amongst women in the six governorates of Kuwait and the factors associated with the initiation of breastfeeding.
Methods:
A sample of 373 women (aged 17-47 years), recruited shortly after delivery from four hospitals in Kuwait, completed a structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify those factors independently associated with the initiation of breastfeeding.
Results:
In total, 92.5% of mothers initiated breastfeeding and at discharge from hospital the majority of mothers were partially breastfeeding (55%), with only 30% of mothers fully breastfeeding. Prelacteal feeding was the norm (81.8%) and less than 1 in 5 infants (18.2%) received colostrum as their first feed. Only 10.5% of infants had been exclusively breastfed since birth, the remainder of the breastfed infants having received either prelacteal or supplementary infant formula feeds at some time during their hospital stay. Of the mothers who attempted to breastfeed, the majority of women (55.4%) delayed their first attempt to breastfeed until 24 hours or more after delivery. Breastfeeding at discharge from hospital was positively associated with paternal support for breastfeeding and negatively associated with delivery by caesarean section and with the infant having spent time in the Special Care Nursery.
Conclusions:
The reasons for the high use of prelacteal and supplementary formula feeding warrant investigation. Hospital policies and staff training are needed to promote the early initiation of breastfeeding and to discourage the unnecessary use of infant formula in hospital, in order to support the establishment of exclusive breastfeeding by mothers in Kuwait.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Manal Dashti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Scott</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christine Edwards</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mona Al-Sughayer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/6">
        <title>Factors affecting intention to breastfeed among Syrian and Jordanian mothers: a comparative cross-sectional study</title>
        <description>Background:
Breastfeeding is considered the ideal method of infant feeding for at least the first six months of life. This study aimed to compare breastfeeding intention between Syrian and Jordanian women and determine factors associated with breastfeeding intention among pregnant women in these two countries.
Methods:
A cross-sectional design was used to collect data from1200 pregnant women aged 18 years and above (600 participants from each country). A self- administered questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics and breastfeeding intention.
Results:
Intention to breastfeed was reported by 77.2% of Syrian and 76.2% of Jordanian pregnant women. There was no significant difference in intention to breastfeed between Syrian women and Jordanian women. In both countries, women with a more positive attitude to breastfeeding, women with previous breastfeeding experience and women with supportive partners were more likely to intend to breastfeed. Syrian women with a monthly family income of more than US$200, younger than 25 and primiparous or having one child were more likely to report an intention to breastfeed their infants. Jordanian women with an education level of less than high school and not living with their family-in-law were more likely to intend to breastfeed.
Conclusions:
In Syria and Jordan, a more positive attitude to breastfeeding, previous breastfeeding experience and presence of supportive husbands are associated with intention to breastfeed. These factors should be considered when planning programs designed to promote breastfeeding in these two countries.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Nemeh Al-Akour</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Khassawneh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yusuf Khader</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alla Ababneh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Azeiza Haddad</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/5">
        <title>Women&apos;s breastfeeding experiences following a significant primary postpartum haemorrhage: A multicentre cohort study</title>
        <description>Background:
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a significant and increasing contributor to maternal mortality and morbidity. Following a PPH, women may have difficulties initiating and sustaining breastfeeding, although little has been published on this issue. The aim of this study was to describe breastfeeding experiences in a cohort of women following a significant PPH.
Methods:
This is a descriptive study based on quantitative and qualitative data collected via questionnaires completed in the first week postpartum and at two and four months postpartum, by 206 women participating in a multicentre study of women&apos;s experiences of a significant primary postpartum haemorrhage (blood loss of 1500 mL or more in the 24 hours following childbirth, and/or a peripartum fall in haemoglobin (Hb) concentration to 7g/dL or less, or of &#8805; 4g/dL).
Results:
Among women with a significant PPH, 63% fully breastfed their babies from birth, whereas 85% said they had hoped to do so (p &lt; 0.001). Only 52% of mothers who intended to either fully or partially breastfeed were able to give their baby the opportunity to suckle within an hour of the birth. Delays were longer in women with greater estimated blood loss and women with the longest delays in breastfeeding were less likely to initiate full breastfeeding. 70% of women with PPH of &lt; 2000 mL were fully breastfeeding in the first postpartum week, whereas less than 50% of those with blood loss &#8805; 3000 mL were able to do so. Overall, 58% of women with significant PPH were fully breastfeeding at two and 45% at four months postpartum.In qualitative data, three major themes were identified: 1) Difficulty initiating or sustaining breastfeeding, 2) Need for education and support; and 3) Emotional sequelae.
Conclusions:
Following a significant PPH, women with greater blood loss are less likely to initiate and sustain full breastfeeding and this may be related, in part, to delays in initial contact with their baby as a consequence of the PPH. These findings have implications for postnatal care as these women may require greater support, education and assistance in initiating and sustaining breastfeeding. In particular, enabling the opportunity for the newborn to suckle as soon as is practicable should be encouraged.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Jane Thompson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Heal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christine Roberts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Ellwood</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-05-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-05-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/4">
        <title>Does opening a milk bank in a neonatal unit change infant feeding practices? A before and after study</title>
        <description>Background:
Donor human milk banks are much more than simple centers for collection, storage, processing, and distribution of donor human milk, as they cover other aspects and represent a real opportunity to promote and support breastfeeding. The aim of our study is to assess the impact that opening a human milk bank has had on the proportion of infants receiving exclusive breast milk at discharge and other aspects related to feeding children with birth weight &lt; or = 1500 g or &lt; 32 weeks gestation admitted to the neonatal unit.
Methods:
The study included babies of &lt; or = 1500 g or &lt; 32 weeks gestation. Fifty infants born from February to July in 2006, before the opening of the human milk bank, and 54 born from February to July in 2008, after its opening, met inclusive criteria. We collected data about days of hospital stay, hours of life when feeding was started, hours of life when full enteral feeding was attained, the type of milk received during admission, and the type of feeding on discharge.
Results:
Children born in 2008 commenced feeding 16 hours earlier than those born in 2006 (p = 0.00). The proportion of infants receiving exclusive breast milk at discharge was 54% in 2006 and 56% in 2008 (p = 0.87). The number of days they received their mother&apos;s own milk during the first 28 days of life was 24.2 days in 2006, compared to 23.7 days in 2008 (p = 0.70). In 2006, 60% of infants received infant formula at least once in the first 28 days of life, compared to 37% in 2008 (p = 0.01).
Conclusions:
The opening of a donor human milk bank in a neonatal unit did not reduce the proportion of infants exclusively fed with breast milk at discharge, but did reduce the proportion of infants that received infant formula during the first four weeks of life. Also, having donor human milk available enables commencement of enteral feeding earlier.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Maria Isabel Utrera Torres</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmen Medina Lopez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sara Vazquez Roman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Clara Alonso Diaz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jaime Cruz-Rojo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elisa Fernandez Cooke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmen R Pallas Alonso</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/3">
        <title>The effect of a controlled manipulation of maternal dietary fat intake on medium and long chain fatty acids in human breast milk in Saskatoon, Canada</title>
        <description>Background:
Few studies in recent years have demonstrated the effect of maternal diet on fatty acid composition of human milk.
Methods:
Fourteen free-living lactating women participated in a cross-over dietary intervention study, consuming a low fat diet (17.6% of energy as fat, 14.4% of energy as protein, 68.0% of energy as carbohydrate) and a high fat diet (40.3% of energy as fat, 14.4% of energy as protein, 45.3% of energy as carbohydrate) each for periods of 4 days, in randomised order. Each mother was her own control. Mature milk samples were collected during each period and analysed for medium and long chain fatty acids.
Results:
The concentration of medium chain fatty acids (MCFA), was 13.6% in breast milk for the low fat diet compared to 11.4% for the high fat (p &lt; 0.05). Arachidonic acid (C20:4n-6) levels were significantly higher in breast milk when women consumed the low fat diet. Increased dietary intake of stearic acid (C18:0) and alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3) on the high fat diet significantly increased proportions of these fatty acids in breast milk (p &lt; 0.05) in 4 days.
Conclusions:
Changing maternal dietary fat intake has a rapid response in terms of changes to fatty acids in breast milk.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Roseann Nasser</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alison Stephen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yeow Goh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>M Thomas Clandinin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/2">
        <title>Infant feeding modalities addressed in two different ways in Eastern Uganda</title>
        <description>Background:
Durations of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and predominant breastfeeding (PBF) from two different assessments, among the same mother-infant population, were investigated to determine the degree to which the assessments yielded overlapping results.
Methods:
Thirty Ugandan mother-infant pairs were followed up weekly from birth to three months of age with weekly short-time feeding recall: the 24-hour recall asked prior to the 1-week recall. In addition, at week 6 and 12 dietary recalls since-birth were conducted. Variables for the duration of EBF and PBF were created from the short-time feeding recalls and the dietary recalls since-birth, respectively. Mean durations of EBF and PBF from the two assessments were compared with Kaplan Meier analysis at week 6 and 12. Reproducibility of dietary recall instruments was also assessed.
Results:
At six weeks postpartum the mean durations of EBF were 0.50 weeks (95% CI: 0, 1.02) according to the weekly short-time recalls and 1.51 weeks (95% CI: 0.66, 2.35) according to the recall since-birth (Mantel-Cox test, p = 0.049). The mean durations of PBF were 4.07 weeks (95% CI: 3.38, 4.77) according to the frequent short-time recalls and 4.50 weeks (95% CI: 3.93, 5.07) according to the recall since-birth, (Mantel-Cox-test, p = 0.82). At twelve weeks the mean durations of EBF were 0.5 weeks (95% CI: 0, 1.1) according to the weekly short-time recalls and 1.4 weeks (95% CI: 0.1, 2.7) according to the recall since-birth (Mantel-Cox-test, p = 0.15). The mean durations of PBF were 5.2 weeks (95% CI: 3.9, 6.5) according to the weekly short-time recalls and 6.6 weeks (95% CI: 5.4, 7.8) according to recall since-birth (Mantel-Cox-test, p = 0.20). Reports of feeding categories and early feeding practices showed high reproducibility.
Conclusion:
Comparing duration of EBF and PBF in this group of mother-infant pairs showed overlapping results from the weekly short-time assessment and the recall since-birth at twelve weeks, with the latter yielding slightly longer duration of the respective feeding modalities. The retrospective recall since-birth could be assessed as a cost-reducing tool compared to the frequent follow-up addressing duration of respective infant feeding modalities for evaluation of programmes promoting safer infant feeding practices.Trial registrationThe study was part of formative studies for the ongoing study PROMISE EBF registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00397150.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Ingunn Engebretsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rebecca Shanmugam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>A. Elisabeth Sommerfelt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Tumwine</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thorkild Tylleskar</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/1">
        <title>A prospective study of the effect of delivery type on neonatal weight gain pattern in exclusively breastfed neonates born in Shiraz, Iran </title>
        <description>Background:
In this exploratory study, the contribution of delivery type to the weight gain pattern for full-term infants with exclusive breastfeeding in the first month of infancy was determined. In addition, breastfeeding success among cesarean section (C-section) delivery mothers based on their neonate&apos;s weight gain at the end of the first month of infancy was evaluated.
Methods:
A cohort of 92 neonates born in Shiraz, from July 10 to August 10, 2007 was followed longitudinally. The data were collected during the first month postpartum at three occasions: 3 to 7 days postpartum, 10-21 days postpartum and 24-31 days postpartum.
Results:
Among 92 mothers in this study, 35 (38%) were delivered by C-section. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) showed that delivery type (p &lt; 0.01), receipt of advice about breastfeeding (p = 0.03) and neonate&apos;s age (p &lt; 0.01) significantly affected weight gain. GEE estimated the values of the parameters under study and the testing contribution of each factor to weight gain, leading to the conclusion that gender, parities and maternal education did not contribute to weight gain. The neonate&apos;s weight gain pattern for C-section deliveries lies below that of normal vaginal deliveries until 25 days postpartum, when weight gain for C-section deliveries became higher than that for normal vaginal deliveries.
Conclusions:
Type of delivery contributes strongly to the weight gain pattern in the first month of infancy. In spite of greater weight loss among C-section birth neonates in the first days of life, at the end of the first month neonates showed a similar weight gain. Consequently, mothers with C-section delivery can successfully exclusively breastfeed.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/5/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Azadeh Saki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Eshraghian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kazem Mohammad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abbas Rahimi Foroushani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Bordbar</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2010, 5:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/16">
        <title>Social support during childbirth as a catalyst for early breastfeeding initiation for first-time Nigerian Mothers


</title>
        <description>Background:
Initiation of breastfeeding can be difficult in a busy maternity centre with inadequate manpower and social support. This study aims to explore the role of psychosocial support offered by companions on breastfeeding initiation among first-time mothers.
Methods:
This is a secondary data analysis of a randomised controlled trial conducted among women attending the antenatal clinic of the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria in 2007. Those in the experimental group were asked to bring someone of their choice to the labour room to act as a companion; the comparison group received standard care. The results of 209 HIV negative women who had vaginal births were analysed. The main outcome measure was time to initiation of breastfeeding after childbirth.
Results:
Of the total, 94 had companions during labour while 115 did not have a companion. The median time to breastfeeding initiation was significantly shorter in those with companions compared to controls (16 vs. 54 minutes; p &lt; 0.01). The cumulative survival analysis indicated that all in the treatment group had initiated breastfeeding by 26 minutes, while among the control group none had commenced at 30 minutes post-delivery with some as late as 12 hours. After Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for possible confounders, the outcome still showed a significant hazard ratio of 207.8 (95%CI 49.2, 878.0; p &lt; 0.01) among women who were supported by a companion.
Conclusion:
Use of companions during labour is associated with earlier time to breastfeeding initiation among first-time mothers in Nigeria.Trial RegistrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12609000994280.</description>
        <link>http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/4/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Imran Morhason-Bello</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Babatunde Adedokun</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Oladosu Ojengbede</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Breastfeeding Journal 2009, 4:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-4358-4-16</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Breastfeeding Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-4358</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
